JohnB
15th June 2005, 12:27.13 PM
Question for the "Spot Play" guys:
What kind of change in your ROI have you seen in your spot plays when plays are made before late scratches are taken into consideration? I have been working on a couple of high volume spot plays, looking for a way to take advantage of rebates. Ideally looking to put a bunch of bets in early in the morning, and hopefully count the winnings in the evening :)
I have 2 plays that have tested well forward and backward, using "after-scratch" horses. Spot Play #1 gets around 20% winners with 1.03 ROI (before rebate), generating around 400 plays per month (across all tracks), and Spot Play #2 gets around 25% winners with 1.07 ROI (again before rebate), generating around 300 plays per month. I have been tracking the "before-scratch" results for the last 2 months, and the "before-scratch" Spot Play #1 has underperformed the "after-scratch" results for the same time period by about .08, while the "before-scratch" Spot Play #2 has outperformed the "after-scratch" results by about .06. I realize that 2 months of data is not sufficient to draw any significant conclusions - wondering if anyone else has done a similar study of their spot plays in terms of "before-scratch" and "after-scratch" results. I seem to recall an old post by someone (Fred? Hurrikane?) that mentioned that their ROI generally drops by around .05 when they put in their spot plays before scratches, but I can't seem to find that post. Anyone have any thoughts on the subject?
Thanks,
John
What kind of change in your ROI have you seen in your spot plays when plays are made before late scratches are taken into consideration? I have been working on a couple of high volume spot plays, looking for a way to take advantage of rebates. Ideally looking to put a bunch of bets in early in the morning, and hopefully count the winnings in the evening :)
I have 2 plays that have tested well forward and backward, using "after-scratch" horses. Spot Play #1 gets around 20% winners with 1.03 ROI (before rebate), generating around 400 plays per month (across all tracks), and Spot Play #2 gets around 25% winners with 1.07 ROI (again before rebate), generating around 300 plays per month. I have been tracking the "before-scratch" results for the last 2 months, and the "before-scratch" Spot Play #1 has underperformed the "after-scratch" results for the same time period by about .08, while the "before-scratch" Spot Play #2 has outperformed the "after-scratch" results by about .06. I realize that 2 months of data is not sufficient to draw any significant conclusions - wondering if anyone else has done a similar study of their spot plays in terms of "before-scratch" and "after-scratch" results. I seem to recall an old post by someone (Fred? Hurrikane?) that mentioned that their ROI generally drops by around .05 when they put in their spot plays before scratches, but I can't seem to find that post. Anyone have any thoughts on the subject?
Thanks,
John